Home » Q&A

Should Twenty20 Be The Only Form Of Cricket For International Purposes?

17 December 2009 8 Comments

Cricket has struggled to reach the western part of the world. Could T20 do the trick? I’m asking you. This will be put to vote.

8 Comments »

  • Plain Silly said:

    I mean, here in the U.S.,
    I have gotten everyone in my sub division (even the racist U.S. hicks) to play cricket
    We have a cricket league
    So we need 2020 to expand.
    Test isnt marketable.

  • Cool Guy said:

    For Expanding it internationally it looks good suggestion.
    But Traditional cricket loving countries will still prefer test matches and 50 over matches

  • Bill P said:

    The proper form of international cricket is test cricket. ODI for the cricket world cup and T20 who don’t have any attention span.

  • ╚╡ReD DeViL for LYF╞╝ said:

    T20 is the only hope for cricket to spread Worldwide.
    ICC should find a solution to save test cricket too..
    Yes,T20 will do the trick..

  • MNIDK!!! said:

    Although T20 could he helpful in marketing the game worldwide, they shouldn’t ever do away with Test cricket.

  • huck finn said:

    yes,
    In new cricketing countries,like US,European countries other than UK
    T20 is the right way to popularize cricket

  • arsalan_ said:

    i reckon same quote for test cricket :D

  • matt said:

    no

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.