Rise of Twenty-20 means too much of cricket. Will it be prove a boomerang by gradually diminishing the royal touch and hence popularity to cricket ?

England – the birth place of cricket has never won any ICC trophy yet. Youngsters in england want to be like David Backhaem or wayne roonie but not like Andrew flintoff or Michael Vaughn. When you see jam packed stadium when matches held in india, south africa or australia and when you see empty stands in england which is the birth place of cricket, you can easily make out the difference. What could be the reason behind it?

Is it MNC/Media managed ?
Is it truly a good game ?
Is it just pASS TIME for the lazy millions .
Is it considered glamourous .
Is it considered a big money game .
Is it D company sponsored .
Does it have a link with terrorism – as phenomenal rise of cricket has seen a rise of international terrorism as well.
Is